Now, the
fount of the One Mind is free from existence and non-existence and is
independently pure. The ocean of the three levels of apprehension of emptiness2
merges the absolute and conventional and is perfectly calm. While calmly fusing
two, it is not one. Independently pure, it is free from extremes, but does
not lie in the center. Not lying in the center, yet free from extremes,
non-existent dharmas do not abide in non-existence, and marks that are not
non-existent do not abide in existence.
Since it
is not one yet merges dualities, non-absolute phenomena are not originally
conventional, and the non-conventional principle is not originally absolute.
Since it merges dualities and yet is not one, there is nothing thatthe natures
of the absolute and conventional do not establish, and there are no marks of
purity and pollution not contained within. Since it is free from extremes, yet
not in the center, there are no existent or non-existent dharmas that are not
created, and no positive or negative implications that are not subsumed.
Accordingly,
without
refutation, there is nothing not refuted; without positing,
there is nothing not posited. We can call it the ultimate principle of
no-principle, the great being-so of not being-so. This is the general message
of this sūtra. It is precisely because it is the great being-so of not being-so
that the words of the speaker mysteriously match the center of the ring.3 Since
it is the ultimate principle of no principle, the doctrine that is explained
transcends this world. Since it leaves nothing unrefuted, it is called the Vajrasamādhi.
Since there is nothing it does not establish, it is called the Sūtra of the
Compendium of the Great Vehicle. None of its meanings and doctrines fall outside
of these two. Therefore it is also called the Numberless Meanings and
Doctrines. But being constrained to tender only one title, we call it the Vajrasamādhi-sūtra.
-Preface to the Exposition to the
Vajra Samadhi Sutra, a commentary by Zen Master Won-Hyo
The above commentary by the Zen Master should open the eyes of the Tibetan scholars from the various lineages such as Sakya, Gelug, Kagyu and Nyingma. I'd like to think of it as the Madhyamaka in Zen. But Won Hyo is talking about the nature of the One Mind. He is not refuting someone else's theory to prove he has the most correct emptiness theory.